Real-world Auto Capture test

Xactimate Auto Capture Three-Room Field Test

Neil uses Auto Capture from start to finish across three interior rooms, then compares the result with manual measurements. The point is not to promote the tool blindly; it is to see where the workflow saves time, where it struggles, and what an experienced user still needs to verify.

Watch Neil in the field

Xactimate Mobile Auto Capture

Published

TXT

Transcript-backed lesson notes

The transcript records a practical three-room Auto Capture test. Neil positions the feature as useful for one-, two-, and three-room losses, but he validates the result with a Disto and watches for cleanup time before calling it production-ready.

  • The test starts inside the sketch workflow

    Neil moves through the sketch area, Sketch AR, and the newly released Auto Capture feature so the viewer sees where the tool actually lives in the mobile workflow.

    Sketch AR / Auto Capture / mobile sketch

  • Small losses are the first practical lane

    The transcript specifically points toward one-, two-, and three-room losses as the likely early use case, where speed can matter without making the geometry too complex.

    one-room loss / three-room loss / simple rooms

  • Validation is the deciding step

    Neil checks measurements with the Disto and looks at photo workflow after capture. The real lesson is whether the captured file survives verification, not whether the first scan looks impressive.

    validate measurements / DistoX4 / photos

DRL

Field drills from the lesson

These are practical exercises a contractor, independent adjuster, public adjuster, or estimator can use to turn the video into a repeatable field habit.

  • Run Auto Capture through three connected rooms and record the total capture time.
  • Verify at least four dimensions with a laser measure and mark any corrections.
  • Decide whether the corrected result was faster than a normal room-by-room sketch.
01

Watch the complete three-room capture

The demonstration follows a small interior sequence instead of showing only a successful single wall. That makes it easier to judge how the user moves between rooms, closes geometry, and handles the finished sketch.

02

Compare the result with known measurements

A visual model can appear convincing while still being off where accuracy matters. Neil checks the captured result against manual measurements so the evaluation includes more than speed.

03

Separate convenience from production readiness

A useful field test asks specific questions.

  • Did the room close correctly?
  • Were important dimensions close enough for the intended use?
  • How much correction was required?
  • Was the total workflow faster after review?
  • Which rooms still need another method?
04

Create a team standard before broad adoption

Teams should document supported devices, setup steps, verification tolerances, fallback tools, and final-review responsibility before treating Auto Capture as a default production process.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

  • Does this test prove Auto Capture is accurate on every property?

    No. It records one real-world three-room test. Property conditions, device hardware, software updates, lighting, room complexity, and operator technique can affect another result.

  • What should be compared during an Auto Capture test?

    Compare critical dimensions, room relationships, openings, correction time, total workflow time, and the completeness of the final sketch.

  • Can Neil help a company test Auto Capture before rollout?

    Yes. A team program can use controlled rooms and the company's current devices to establish a practical capture, verification, and fallback process.

We will get back to you

Tell us what you need

Send a few details about your role, your team, and what you want to improve. Our team will review it and get back to you.